Quantcast

« Andre Stubbe's Robotic Eyes | Main | This Dolphin Thanks Bridgestone Tires »

February 16, 2007

Maybe a MacBook Nano?

Hopeful Macbook

First don't take the image too seriously. It's just a mockup - a fantasy of mine for an ultra-portable Macbook. AppleInsider has reason to believe Apple is indeed looking to release such a computer, hitting store shelves in 3 months. They believe in a smaller, wider MacBook with solid state memory in lieu of an optical disc drive. The former dramatically increasing battery life; the latter enabling the computer to go as thin as 3/4 of an inch. But why would Apple build such a computer?

Apple does tremendously well in almost all markets. For them, it's not about being number 1. It's about seeing consistent growth year after year and there's one market where Apple continues to slip - Japan. The Japanese are obsessed with ultra-portability and miniaturization. Even the thin MacBook isn't thin enough. With subbie notebooks from Sharp, Fujitsu and a slew of others - it's a tough market to crack but Apple has a huge advantage. There's cache behind their name and excellent hardware/software synergy. Even Time Cook (Apple's second in command) recently told analysts;

"The market in Japan is among the weakest in the world for us. However, having said that, we're not pleased with our performance and we've got a number of activities underway to improve them"

They can't be talking about the iPod since it does pretty well over there. All that's left is OS X adoption and that requires machines to run them. The Japanese are not about desktops. They're not about notebooks. They're all about ultra-compact sub-notebooks and Apple is not a company to segregate their hardware line up by region so rest assured, if the Japanese get a sub-notebook, so will we.

So what kind of specs could one expect from a machine like this? Ultimately to shed weight - some newer expensive tech would have to be implemented OR cuts would have to be made to meet the new profile. For Apple and because of how Apple operates, I believe both rules will apply. Here is my realistic wishlist.

MacBook Nano

My reasoning;

Posted by tranism at 2:13 PM | Permalink | Digg! | del.icio.us | StumbleUpon Toolbar

Comments

60 GB is kind of small don't you think. Still, if they offered something like this - knowing me I'd probably bite.

Posted by: Douglass at February 16, 2007 4:01 PM

As long as they can make it last 6-10 hours - then I'll go for it.

Posted by: Quyen at February 16, 2007 4:10 PM

60 GB is kind of small don't you think. Still, if they offered something like this - knowing me I'd probably bite.

I think the biggest solid state drive is 64 GB by SanDisk and its current asking price easily adds several hundred dollars to any machine. If Apple is indeed going to use solid state memory, I think they'll use a smaller size - something like 4 GB where the operating system resides. You still get the performance boost but all saved personal data will still go on a hard drive instead.

Posted by: Jamison at February 17, 2007 2:57 AM

I belive you will see perpendicular drives as the supplemental replacement for this type of device.

I think the 80 gig used in the iPod classic along with NAS (Network attached Storage) is going to be the next ground that Apple adopts to the industry.

Airport Extreme (N) already has a serach for wirless HDD built right in.

Mobile = 80 or 160 gig
Home / Office = Whdd (NAS)

Posted by: Michael Wright at October 5, 2007 1:50 PM

Whatever happens, it can't come soon enough. Even if I have to wait 50 days, as long as something better (smaller) is on the horizon, I gotta wait it out. The current MacBook is cool, but it isn't Japan cool - yet.

Posted by: waffle911 at October 7, 2007 10:16 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)